Buying a baby is not a human right, whether you spunked into a jar and used a turkey baster on someone, or paid money for an egg or womb. We all know who the women are when it’s baby-making time. Otherwise tranny transvestites would want to be carrying them in their ball-sac.
You are trafficking in humans and I find this practise vile, unconscionable and wrong. Fuck how you feel, having a child is NOT a human right. For anyone. I have one son. I also have one kidney, and other health complications, and was told in no uncertain terms I would NEVER have a child. I came to terms with this in my early 20s; I resolved to be the best aunty anyone had ever seen.
Fast forward, I’m 34 and pregnant. Something I never thought would happen. It hadn’t happened in the years of unprotected and stupid sex I had up until then. Or even with the good sex. Despite the risks, after talking with a doctor about my health complications, I decided to have this child. It wasn’t on my bingo card for the longest time, and now it was. Full disclosure: it nearly killed me, I laboured from Wednesday to Saturday morning, and underwent an emergency c-section because of kidney failure. It was a close-run thing: my midwife told me I had 15 minutes to get the bairn out or we were both dead. This was at 5.58am Saturday July ??, 2000. My lad was born at 6.17am - even THEN I was late haha. Talk about pulling Death’s whiskers.
My son is a miracle, despite all odds, my health, missing kidney bla bla bla he’s here. I guess I’m trying to say I DO understand the longing and desire to have children. It CAN be lived with. It can. I was as happy as I could be, before I got pregnant. I loved my life. Nobody was more surprised than ME that I fell pregnant. But in this world of ‘Me first!’ and the cult of the ‘I’, nothing is off limits any more.
Surrogacy? I’d have it only within your own family. If you can’t find a relation to carry a baby for you, fuck the fuck up. This whole child trafficking edifice disguised as ‘it’s your right to have a family’ and other bullshit needs to stop. Babies need their mother.
Homosexual men? Shut your fucking gay hole about having a baby. You have no right. No right at all. You’re homosexuals, two dicks, no womb. Renting a womb to have a baby that’s an accessory to your lifestyle is not a human right. Go fuck yourselves.
Lesbians? Same. If you can find a sperm donor, you’ll be away. It’s still not a human right to have a child. Yet at least with the women, the baby has a mother. I know, I know, I’m an intolerant cunt and this will trigger you. Too bad. CHILDREN ARE NOT ACCESSORIES OR CEMENT FOR RELATIONSHIPS. (They’re hand grenades, but that’s another column.)
This recent case had two homosexual woman-hating men with a baby say the mother has no right to see the child. There’s no ‘vacancy’ in their queer life. So far, so misogynistic: the trope of the hateful gay man who’s a son of a bitch (no wonder he hates his mother hey?) has come to life. Over and over, sadly.
Woman Hating Homosexuals: How NOVEL.
Joseph Taylor bought a baby in Cyprus as a single parent. Yuk. Favourable coverage of his plight instead of ‘why does this single man want a baby?’ questions. WHY DOES THIS SINGLE MAN WANT A BABY?
You know I’m cynical as fuck, reader. There are numerous posts on Twatter about that hateful tranny man and his baby: you know the one, where he’s preening and the baby is upset, distressed, wondering ‘Why the FUCK am I on this hairy man-chest instead of my mama?’ You can go find them, I’m so sickened by his posturing and fuckery, I ain’t linking to him. Or the cases where hospital staff are doing a Broadway number for some tranny cockfrocker while the baby shakes with trauma. Fuck you, trannyscum.
NZ has a bill before the House, to improve surrogacy arrangements. You can submit on it here:
One question: ‘After a surrogate-born person’s parentage has transferred to the intended parents, in what circumstances should a marriage or civil union be prohibited between the surrogate-born person and the surrogate or a member of the surrogate’s family? Is the approach in new section 36 appropriate, or could a less restrictive approach be appropriate? For example, should a surrogate-born person who has no genetic connection to their surrogate and whose parentage has been transferred be able to enter into a civil union or marriage with a person who is a child of the surrogate?’
HOW CAN WE LEGALISE INCEST?
The erosion of boundaries and barriers to child trafficking are being obfuscated, weakened and outright destroyed by western governments, and here in NZ via this sneaky and technical mishmash bill.
‘carries over the existing offence of obtaining a gamete from an individual who is under 16 years of age but establishes a defence that the defendant must prove that they obtained the gamete for the purpose of preserving it and that an appropriate consent was given to the procedure; and
carries over the existing offence of using a gamete that was obtained from an individual who is under 16 years of age but broadens the defence to allow the gamete to be used for a lawful purpose with the consent of the individual after the individual turns 16 years of age.’
I wonder if this covers the egg and sperm harvesting for the youth being sterilised by ‘gender-affirming’ care and is a specific get-out clause - here’s that cynicism again!
Look at the unholy mess here, in NZ. And this is just ONE case:
Even HERE people claim everyone has the right to children. STFU. You don’t.
I’m going to submit on this bill, there’s heaps of technical jargon, and it’s deliberate, to me. I’ll make my case and cite examples of men having babies, that it’s child trafficking, and no person has a right to have a child. Because that’s what it is: child trafficking.
#WaronChildren #WaronWomen #XX #BabiesNeedTheirMOTHER #MenAreNotMothers #FuckYourFeelings
I practically burst a blood vessel reading about those vile misogynists who don't want the mother to have contact with her son. She did this incredible thing for them, and they think they can just discard her. Utterly repulsive human beings who should be nowhere near a child if that's how they behave.
Well said. I agree with you about all the surrogacy stuff. I also think the whole egg and sperm freezing industry is contributing to much of the distress and dysfunction we are seeing with kids (and adults).
How can it make sense to store eggs and sperm in cold temperatures and chemicals and think that the babies won't be affected? They are after all 'out of synch' with time and connection with the mother's microbiome. Are they affected at a deep cellular level and traumatised for life, left feeling 'lost' and disconnected due to their first 'home' being so clinical and sterile. What of the long periods, months sometimes years spent in those freezers? Is there a connection with autism and other disorders I wonder? I have written about this on my substack, if you're interested.
I think it's way past time that we talked more about this and put the unborn children first. It's so unfair to continue with this baby factory model. Big pharma of course love all this stuff and it goes hand in hand with all the other grotesque frankenscience of 'gender' mutilations and late term abortions/organ harvesting. Enough already!
By the way, I hope you saw Kellie-Jay speaking to Megyn Kelly in LA.
As I've said before, I reckon that we have to stop using the terms 'trans' & 'gender' and call it what it is. Mental illness.
Much love to you and your family